◉ HEADLINES

Court dismisses Santhara’s suit over visit to New Zealand during Covid-19

Judge Zulqarnain Hassan made the decision after finding that the defendant’s statement was a reasonable comment

9:06 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The Sessions Court here today dismissed the suit brought by Datuk Seri Edmund Santhara Kumar against Batu MP P. Prabakaran for allegedly defaming the former deputy federal territories minister’s visit to New Zealand during the Covid-19 pandemic, three years ago.

Judge Zulqarnain Hassan made the decision after finding that the defendant’s statement (Prabakaran) was a reasonable comment, as the latter, as a representative of the people, had a responsibility to voice out public issues.

Zulqarnain in his judgment said the defendant disputed the plaintiff’s (Santhara) vacation for 55 days in New Zealand, as it took place at a time when the Movement Control Order (MCO) was being enforced due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

“In the opinion of the court, the issue of there being movement restrictions and a deputy minister being able to go on holiday is a public one. 

“The defendant disputed the plaintiff’s actions not because the plaintiff was Datuk Seri Santhara Kumar, but because the plaintiff was a deputy minister at the time.

“What’s more, at the time, Parliament was also suspended because there was an emergency. 

“Due to that, the court finds the plaintiff’s defamation claim untenable and therefore dismisses the plaintiff’s suit with costs of RM18,000,” he said when delivering the judgment during an online proceeding today.

Santhara filed the suit on June 23, 2021, against Prabakaran for allegedly making defamatory remarks regarding the former’s visit to New Zealand in 2020.

In his statement of claim, Santhara said that the defendant held a press conference outside the New Zealand High Commission on March 17, 2021, between 9.30 am and 2 pm, and issued untrue and false information about the plaintiff’s responsibilities as a deputy minister.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant or his representative had sent a memorandum to the High Commissioner of New Zealand criticising the approval and permission granted to the plaintiff to visit New Zealand and the defendant had also contacted embassy officials to obtain information about the plaintiff’s application to enter the country.

Prabakaran through a statement of defence filed on September 8, 2021, claimed there was no malicious intent to tarnish the plaintiff’s image or reputation through the statement issued.

At today’s proceedings, Santhara was represented by lawyer N. Krishnan Nair while Prabakaran was represented by lawyer Dinesh Muthal.

Meanwhile, Prabakaran in a media statement expressed his gratitude over the suit’s dismissal.

“I would like to thank the defence lawyers as well as witnesses, especially Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Senator Isaiah D. Jacob, and other individuals involved either directly or indirectly in this case,” he said. – August 4, 2023

Topics

 

◉ Popular

National shuttlers demand RM2 million salaries: can BAM keep up financially?

Several top athletes aim for salaries that could outpace even the highest-earning footballers, raising questions about the sustainability of funding within Malaysian sports

RM200m World Cup rights fee puts Malaysia’s 2026 viewing at risk

Malaysia could miss live coverage of the 2026 FIFA World Cup as a steep RM200 million broadcasting fee strains Astro and RTM, raising doubts over whether fans will be able to watch football’s biggest tournament

More than 100 Foodpanda riders protest over low wages at company headquarters

New Google Maps-based system forces riders to make more deliveries to make ends meet

◉ Related