KUALA LUMPUR — The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has stepped up efforts in its ongoing investigation into the ARM case, warning that it may seek international assistance, including through Interpol, if businessman Chai Jin Shern, also known as James Chai continues to evade questioning.
In a statement today, MACC said it has so far recorded statements from 17 witnesses, including officials from the Ministry of Economy and agencies such as the Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA), as part of its probe.
The commission added that it has also secured key documents, including agreements and supporting materials, while statements from eight more individuals — some of whom are currently overseas are expected to be recorded.
“Investigations into the ARM case are actively ongoing, with multiple witnesses already interviewed and crucial documents obtained to assist in the inquiry,” MACC said.
James Chai has been identified as a person of interest required to assist with the investigation. A Notice to Locate him was issued on March 4.
MACC said it later received a letter from his legal representatives dated March 9, stating that he was unable to attend for questioning due to travel costs and work commitments.
“In response, MACC granted an extension on March 13 for him to appear on March 31. However, he failed to indicate any intention to do so,” the commission said.
The anti-graft body has now issued a fresh directive requiring him to present himself within two weeks, adding that it is willing to cover the cost of his return flight to Malaysia.
“Should he continue to fail to attend after being granted two extensions, the Commission will consider seeking cooperation through international channels, including Interpol or foreign enforcement agencies, to locate him and ensure his attendance,” MACC said.
The commission stressed that individuals called to assist in investigations are legally obliged to cooperate with authorities.
“If James Chai maintains that he has committed no wrongdoing, the appropriate course of action is to present himself to MACC to provide a statement, rather than issuing explanations in the public domain without appearing before the authorities,” it added.
Reiterating its stance, MACC said no individual is above the law and assured that the investigation would proceed in a “professional, independent, and evidence-based manner.” – April 1, 2026